Senior Director - Anonymous employee Mastercard Employee Review

1.0
Mar 20, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits except for medical. Great opportunities here for anyone that DOES NOT work in technology. Also great for people from India or women. Very Very bad place to be for male Caucasian men who are treated differently with less opportunities. You don’t want to work here if you are very technical.

Cons

Marketing company that continues to market themselves as a technology company but is very far from it. Technical workers are treated like dogs and burned and churned. Task masters rule with no technical backgrounds. They focus on importing labor on H1bs into America vs hiring citizens and labor will work night and day to not be sent back to India. Other roles are fine there if you are from the CEO’s country of origin. Very poor quality software and products.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Technically strong and work culture is good

Cons

interview process is long , no issues

4.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All