The significant gap between Mastercard Dublin salaries and market rates is getting worse - Senior Consultant Mastercard Employee Review

3.0
Jan 10, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Flexible working from home policy - Inspiring CEO - Ability to move roles across teams and countries

Cons

- Dublin office are not transparent with new hires to set expectations that salary increases are on average 2% p/a. - Overall compensation across positions in Dublin is poor. NY and ST Louis offices do a far better job than Dublin office at bench marking salaries to the market. - On average, between 0% and 2.5% salary increase per annum - which leads to salary being noncompetitive within 2yrs of anyone joining Dublin office. -Struggling to bring exceptional talent into the Dublin office as can't compete on salary + pension. - Pension is below the average 14% pension contribution in tech sector. MC contribute a max of 10% towards pension. This is a big consideration for anyone joining considering pension is 10% of lower salary versus 14% pension based on higher salary. - Annual reviews are based on department bell curve.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
May 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture. Stable. Analytical and rewarding if you find the right product.

Cons

Slower career growth. Not as influential

4.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All