The "flexible" time off policy is a misnomer - Senior Associate Grant Thornton Employee Review

3.0
Feb 9, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I needed a new job due to my former employer losing a major contract and having to conduct layoffs, and I appreciate that GT gave me an opportunity to break into data analytics when I was mid-career and had not worked in the consulting world. The people I worked with in my brief time there were all smart and eager to help out, and the company really emphasized collaboration and working as a team. HR was really on the ball at getting me a decent offer and staying on top of my paperwork.

Cons

I knew by the end of my first day orientation at GT that I was going to need a NEW new job when I learned about the flexible time off policy. At GT, you can take as many weeks of vacation as you want, as long as you put in the 1870 or so billable hours for the client and another 300 or so hours towards training, writing proposals, and schmoozing at GT events. Excluding ten holidays per year, that means that you are expected to put in about 2170 or so hours over 50 weeks of work. Do the math, and you are doing nearly 44 hours per week even if you take zero weeks of vacation. Add an hour a week of additional work for each week of vacation that you would like to take. So yeah, you can take off half the year if you like, if you can get your team leaders to approve it and want to commit to working 70 hours per week for the other half of the year. Not for me! I'm too old and cynical to believe that I'm going to make partner if I work my tail off. I also hated that the clock reigned supreme. We had to enter our hours down to the quarter hour, and the ADP software was programmed to send a reminder to you to enter your hours for the day by 10 am the next morning, and if you fail to meet that deadline, you get a warning or a demerit or something. I stayed on top of it, but it all fed into my perception that I was just a revenue-generating unit within an impersonal bureaucracy. I was working in the federal practice at GT, and before I came to GT I had already worked as a contractor at federal agencies where I worked 40 hours per week and would get paid overtime if I was asked to work beyond that. I also contributed to proposals, but it was considered an optional activity. And I didn't have to schmooze constantly to get put onto new projects. I left GT to accept an offer with one of these smaller companies that offered me a much better opportunity with higher pay and more flexibility on the lifestyle items. Also, this may be a pro or con, depending on your background: I was in the data analytics practice, but culturally I am a techie, not a business major. I felt that business majors would feel much more at home at GT than techies who are used to being less buttoned-down. Everyone was smart and helpful, but it wasn't really my tribe, and I didn't expect that over the long term I was going to fit in very well, which was ultimately going to hurt my ability to get staffed on teams.

avatar
Grant Thornton Response
7y
Thank you for sharing your feedback - We’re grateful to hear about your experience, both the positive and practical areas for improvement. Our culture and career initiatives focus on offering our employees the resources to have flexibility, grow personally and professionally, and make a substantial impact on others. We value your opinion and will use this feedback to help make Grant Thornton an even better place to work.

Explore other reviews about Grant Thornton

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly work environment and people

Cons

None that I can think of

2.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some folks are great to work with. Some of the leaders really do care.

Cons

Workday practice is a total mess. They have trouble selling work and hours are much lower than they should be so consultants end up spread very thin across multiple projects and still can't hit utilization targets on paper even if they are working very hard in actuality. The independence requirements are insane!! If I had known I would have to disclose all of my investments and be told wha t I am or am not allowed to invest money in I would not have taken the job. Independence is total hell and most consulting firms don't subject employees to those invasive requirements.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All