employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

Toxic, fearful culture - Anonymous employee General Motors (GM) Employee Review

2.0
Sep 19, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, interesting work, opportunities to make an impact.

Cons

The culture for salaried office workers at GM has shifted since the new "Chief People Officer" came on board. Gone are the days of transparent communication. I have literally been in an all people meeting and heard "no layoffs" only to hear the very next day of layoffs. The culture is now toxic and fearful. The new "performance based" workforce means five percent of workers will be put into an underperforming category no matter what and will likely lose their jobs at that time. A manager leading a high-performing team will be forced to still rate five percent of her employees this way, regardless of their actual performance. This is creating a culture where employees are in competition with each other, lest they be part of the five percent. And that totally negates the "One Team" behavior that GM has encouraged for many years. Our Workplace of Choice surveys are so bad, they don't even report the results anymore. I have been a proud GM employee for many years and invested my salary in our products regularly, but I fear the future here is bleak. They have replaced many salaried office workers with staff from the Philippines, all while experiencing record profits and spending billions on stock buybacks. Corporate greed at its worst.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
Apr 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good benefits and good culture

Cons

as of now, no cons,

3.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All