employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

A Once Great Culture Is Now in Shambles - Senior Software Engineer General Motors (GM) Employee Review

2.0
Sep 1, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Depending on what organization you're in, the work/life balance can be pretty good. Some areas can be a nightmare. But it's mostly good.

Cons

The culture of the company has taken a HUGE nose dive in the last year. Like, plummeting from a cliff sort of nose dive. It's in the basement at this point. Despite multiple assurances that layoffs are over, they lay more people off. They're gradually forcing people back into the office more and more, under the guise of cOLLaBoRatION. And rather than focusing on improving the remote collaboration experience and keeping the people, they keep the buildings and kick a bunch of people to the curb. At this point, there's zero trust in senior leadership, and I don't see that getting better any time soon. Also, pay scales for software development is not on par with the rest of the industry. They want top tier talent, but aren't willing to pay top-tier salaries (or even mid-tier really). Prepare to be undervalued.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
May 25, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good salary good working environment

Cons

no wfh,management a lttle bit bad

avatar
General Motors (GM) Response
2w
Thank you for taking the time to write a review! We appreciate hearing about your personal experience and are glad to learn that you enjoy working at GM. Thank you for everything that you do!
3.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All