employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

GM IT - nothing but lies - Associate Software Developer/Tester/QA/Junior BA General Motors (GM) Employee Review

2.0
May 19, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

not many. A good pay for a job right out of college. Young environment since they have hired about 3,000 college hires nationally in the past year for IT.

Cons

- do not care at all about career development even though they will preach to you that they do - managers do not care at all about the big picture of the company - treat college hires like dirt and give them no responsibility at all - tell you its very easy to move around within the company if a role is not a fit for you, HUGE LIE - All processes are non existent yet you have to follow them....nuff said - so many people in roles they are not qualified for and no one cares to train them - Training is a joke at this company and non existent for detailed skills - reward employees based on seniority not over intelligence and hard work In the end all the "promises" used to get me to commit were all lies when I actually got to GM.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
May 25, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good salary good working environment

Cons

no wfh,management a lttle bit bad

avatar
General Motors (GM) Response
2w
Thank you for taking the time to write a review! We appreciate hearing about your personal experience and are glad to learn that you enjoy working at GM. Thank you for everything that you do!
3.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All