employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

Good to place to start, but not a place to stay - Software Developer General Motors (GM) Employee Review

2.0
Feb 15, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

relatively easy to get the job offer. good work-life balance good mentorship(at least in my team) I'm lucky that my team members are really helpful when I just get started, when I have questions I can always find the right people to ask and it works well. Also my manager is really nice and cares about my growth.

Cons

low starting salary lots of red tapes bullying new hires you need to know how to deal with people like a politician to survive, experienced employees like bullying and stabbing others(especially against new hires) in the back. Technical skill is less important than communication skill. You performance is evaluated by whom you know not what you know. Starting salary is the same for all new hires regardless of their background(and it's below the average). No matter if you a CS major or business major, the salary is all the same as software developers

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Very professional environment - Promotions go to the most qualified regardless of race or gender etc - Doing a great job at your role and/or taking on additional work gets noticed - Competitive salaries and benefits

Cons

Work can be demanding at times and, as a profressional, you're expected to get the job done

3.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All