employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

You will never get fired; Neither will your incompetent coworkers or managers - Data Scientist General Motors (GM) Employee Review

2.0
Jul 22, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Jobs security, 401k plan, paid holidays, WFH flexibility (depends on team)

Cons

Management is all talk, no action and they all have their own agenda; no proper project management or realistic scoping with business; the status quo is slightly below mediocrity, so if you are smart and take pride in doing a good job you will be expected to do your work and other people's; don't expect a raise, promotion, or the ability to switch teams.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
Mar 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very Interesting Work Environment, and very complex machinery at play with employees possessing a wealth of information

Cons

Difficult to integrate yourself into the workflow. Meaningful work is often hard to take ownership of as it's high risk and siloed, or can not afford to be delayed.

3.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All