employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

OK for a first job, head for the door after 3 years - Software Developer General Motors (GM) Employee Review

2.0
Jul 2, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Generous benefits (401k, holidays, PTO) Depending upon your boss you might have the option of flex schedule For college hires the raises every 6 months and final promotion after 3 years leaves you close enough to market rate salary wise. The company bonus in previous years was overly generous. Now that sales are declining people have become used to unrealistic > 100% multipliers. I started as a college hire in 2013 and stayed with the company for over 5 years working in different capacities. If you want to move around and try different roles that is possible now (was not so easy when I started).

Cons

At this point the red tape is out of control. Whole teams exists for quality assurance, and no I am not talking about testers. I am talking about people who don't code or know how to code, reviewing your changes with a checklist and creating more and more hoops to jump through to do your job. Do you want a database refresh? Ok fill out this Sharepoint excel request, then copy all the data from that excel file into a special format Excel. Take the special format excel and copy its structure into an email and reference the line number. Email that to the DBA (not-even-kidding). The company has built such a wall around deploying stuff it consumes 50+% of your development cycle. The company was hesitant to deal with low performers for years and now they are paying the price. Generous benefits and an environment where free-riding was pretty easy has resulted in lower than expected attrition. Now that auto sales are declining and we are entering into a crunch cycle, HR and management is trying to clean house. Under performers are being put on performance improvement plans (a nice way of saying 'go away') and those who don't leave once on these plans are typically fired within 6 months. Hiring, except for college hires, has been curtailed. Unfortunately the above does not bode well. Already many teams are overworked carrying the burden of the non-workers. Now that many under performers are being sent packing, their partial workload falls on the rest of the team. This is causing the already overworked high performers who are fed up with the red tape to leave. What is left is mediocrity at this point.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
May 25, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good salary good working environment

Cons

no wfh,management a lttle bit bad

avatar
General Motors (GM) Response
2w
Thank you for taking the time to write a review! We appreciate hearing about your personal experience and are glad to learn that you enjoy working at GM. Thank you for everything that you do!
3.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All