employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

Medio - Analista General Motors (GM) Employee Review

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Home Office, trabajo regional con personas de otros paises, trabajar en una empresa de punta, flexibilidad en horarios, pago del salario en el primer dia habil del mes, bono vacacional y anual

Cons

No hay crecimiento en Argentina, salarios atrasados y no hay actualizacion por inflacion. No tenemos beneficios mas que el HO. Durante el invierno no prenden la calefaccion, Fuera de convenio y no te pagan horas extras. Comedor malo. Si no tenes movilidad propia, la empresa no te ofrece transporte. No hay nigun beneficio en la oficina y es muy ruidosa. Mucha incertidumbre con el futuro de la empresa en Arg.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
Jun 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

it is a good place

Cons

nothing much to say here

3.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All