Once great, now in the tubes - AI Engineer ETS Employee Review

2.0
Sep 24, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Wonderful colleagues - Good work-life balance - Significant autonomy

Cons

- Low pay for engineers - Poor job stability (7 layoffs in 4 years, with more to come) - Overbearing bureaucracy leading to slow career advancement - Leadership disrespects staff and does little to keep their highest performers - Terminal case of short-termism from C-suite ETS used to be a wonderful place to work: People were proud to be there and stayed on for decades; The focus on impact over the bottom line, the laudable mission, and other intangible benefits offset the otherwise low pay (for technical employees). But post-pandemic, the company has been fundamentally hollowed out, and little remains of the original organization both culturally and personnel-wise. Pronounced brain drain has left no one on staff with institutional knowledge. No one has new ideas. No one gives two sh*ts about the company or mission. Everyone just bides there time and waits to be laid off. ETS is now just another corporate husk of its former self, with both its culture and its long-term revenue streams in tatters. If you are reading this review mulling over whether to apply, don't. Do yourself a favor and stay far, far away from this dying organization. I am certain will collapse within this decade.

Explore other reviews about ETS

5.0
Mar 5, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

ETS have a group of outstanding researchers

Cons

like all other industries, it has to face AI impacts

1.0
May 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Support of immediate management and coworkers makes coming to work every day a pleasure.

Cons

Where to start... First, the employee performance evaluation process and methodology has changed from 1) performance vs your job description to 2) OKRs which were completely unattainable and meaningless at every level to 3) rocks and outcomes which again have very little to do with the day to day jobs of most employees. It seems the burden for goals and objectives and performance management has shifted from management to employees as they try to define a methodology that holds only doers responsible for the company's success. All this since Amit Sevak took over. Management manipulated the questions in a recent employee survey to force responses that made it look like there was improvement year over year. Of course, when you add a new President between the employees and the CEO peoples opinion of senior management is improved. Of course when you shift the focus to immediate management from senior management, the responses will be improved. Try issuing the exact same survey as the prior year and see how much "real" improvement there was in the numbers.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All