Assessment Specialist - Anonymous employee ETS Employee Review

3.0
Nov 12, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A tradition of very high standards in assessment and research, with a genuine emphasis on fairness to the test-taker. Excellent benefits--exceptional in some areas. Interesting colleagues. Increasing flexibility with telecommuting and working remotely full-time. The company demonstrates a real commitment to diversity and to community service.

Cons

The pay is good, but has become unevenly distributed in recent years, with positions requiring advanced degrees and extensive experience on the same pay grade as others requiring less of both and less expertise. The current national trend towards assessment as a money-making enterprise has finally reached ETS, so it feels less like a non-profit than it used to--more like a for-profit corporation. It has also resulted in more and more contracts being taken on without sufficient proportional increase in staffing in core areas. There's much more administrative bloat now. [Note: CEO is no longer Kurt Landgraf--Walt MacDonald is now CEO.]

Explore other reviews about ETS

5.0
Mar 5, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

ETS have a group of outstanding researchers

Cons

like all other industries, it has to face AI impacts

1.0
May 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Support of immediate management and coworkers makes coming to work every day a pleasure.

Cons

Where to start... First, the employee performance evaluation process and methodology has changed from 1) performance vs your job description to 2) OKRs which were completely unattainable and meaningless at every level to 3) rocks and outcomes which again have very little to do with the day to day jobs of most employees. It seems the burden for goals and objectives and performance management has shifted from management to employees as they try to define a methodology that holds only doers responsible for the company's success. All this since Amit Sevak took over. Management manipulated the questions in a recent employee survey to force responses that made it look like there was improvement year over year. Of course, when you add a new President between the employees and the CEO peoples opinion of senior management is improved. Of course when you shift the focus to immediate management from senior management, the responses will be improved. Try issuing the exact same survey as the prior year and see how much "real" improvement there was in the numbers.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All