Dow TES - Test Engineer Dow Employee Review

2.0
Sep 15, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits, opportunities for growth, global company I loved my experiences in the plants as an intern, you are treated as family and usually well taken care of. I've enjoyed almost everyone I've worked with at Dow and made a lot of life-long friends

Cons

Dow's TES (tech center) Leadership/ how some TES employees are treated. TES Process Automation/ Process Engineering groups are difficult to work for. You need to charge time to projects like a contractor. Leaders set target "recharge rates" that you must fulfill, but then sometimes don't give you enough work to fulfill them so you have to network into projects yourself. Very weird system. Maybe I just got unlucky but my leadership was constantly changing with high turnaround in these groups. I was underpaid and my leadership prevented me from seeking internal roles because they were unable to backfill positions. Despite our jobs being easily completable from home most of the time, leadership decided to require we come into the office building, rather than leaving us to come in on an as needed basis. If I hadn't switched into TES when I started full-time I'd probably have stayed at Dow. Recommend avoiding it if possible unless changes are made.

Explore other reviews about Dow

5.0
Apr 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Culture and the technical expertise within the company provide for a working environment where you don't work in silo and everyone is willing to help support you

Cons

Administrative systems can be burdensome to overcome.

2.0
Mar 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Cons

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All