Worst company for freshers - Analyst Capgemini Employee Review

1.0
May 10, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Only infrastructure is gud nothing else . .

Cons

First of all if you are a fresher u need to be lucky to get a good trainer. After three months of training they won't judge you by your performance in training rather they will choose randomly for projects.. If your grades are not good during training then they'll kick you out of the company and once you complete your training suddenly the importance of your grades doesn't matter. Person who performs worst during training gets project early but the one whose performance is best will be on bench for months. So basically they don't judge you according to your performance. Staffing partners are not at all supportive. Least number of chances are there that they will give you your preferred location. If you disagree they will simply tell you to leave the company. Without any proper reason they will fire you without giving any warning even if you are on bench saying that you are under probation period. Atleast have some decency to give warning before you fire any fresher. A good management never does that.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All