onbording - Software Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

5.0
Mar 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

easy, supportive, helpfull, well Structured, informative

Cons

slow process, it was little confusing

avatar
Capgemini Response
3mo
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! We appreciate the time you took to provide feedback on your onboarding experience. It is encouraging to hear that the process felt easy, supportive, and helpful, and that it offered a well‑structured and informative start. Creating a smooth and reassuring onboarding journey is important to us, and your acknowledgement reinforces the value of those efforts. We also recognize your point regarding the slower pace and moments of confusion during the process. While these aspects did not overshadow your overall experience, your feedback helps us identify where additional clarity and timely updates can further enhance the journey for future employees. Continuous improvement is a priority, and insights like yours guide us toward refining our processes to make them even more efficient and seamless. Your perspective contributes meaningfully to strengthening the onboarding experience, and we’re glad the overall outcome was positive and supportive.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All