employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

B&H Photo Video

Is this your company?

Terminated after disclosing health issue - Web Developer B&H Photo Video Employee Review

1.0
Jan 2, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

No onboarding. Manager and director were not present for first day. I was given generations old equipment and had to request modernized monitors. I spent two days walking the store by myself the first week. Nobody was there to even show me around then. I was working upstairs, trying to learn the way the store worked.

Cons

Everything was confrontational. The entire time, they were gaslighting me into producing code not mentioned in my resume. Submitting incorrect assets and arguing for immediate turnaround. Or unable to describe the way the marketing strategy worked at all. They also tried to gaslight me for design work. On multiple occasions I was asked to create new creative designs when the only thing that mentioned creative arts was my degree. I have almost 10 years experience in tech. What they failed to realize was that the way a dev uses Photoshop is entirely different than the way a designer would. All this, After shorting the offer 10 grand.

Explore other reviews about B&H Photo Video

5.0
May 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

the company benefits are good

Cons

long hours and some clients can be demanding

2.0
Dec 11, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

• Talented, hard-working colleagues who genuinely care about delivering quality results. • The company has strong brand recognition and a long history in the photo/video industry. • Opportunities to take ownership of complex projects and develop cross-functional skills.

Cons

Across my time with the company, I experienced several leadership and communication challenges that affected team morale, clarity, and psychological safety: • Unclear expectations and inconsistent communication: Project success criteria and performance expectations were often not clearly defined, leading to misalignment, rework, and uncertainty about priorities. • Feedback lacked structure and consistency: Performance feedback was irregular and frequently non-constructive. When guidance was given, it tended to be broad criticism rather than actionable steps for improvement. • Difficulty obtaining clarification when needed: Team members often struggled to receive timely clarification on responsibilities or project direction, making it harder to understand the full scope of their roles. • Discouraged escalation and limited support: At times, employees felt discouraged from bringing concerns to HR or other support channels, creating an environment where individuals hesitated to seek fair resolution. • Meetings used in ways that increased stress: Meetings were sometimes scheduled under one expectation but then used to discuss unrelated issues or deliver prolonged criticism, contributing to anxiety and reduced trust. • Perceived inconsistency in how opportunities and scrutiny were applied: Certain employees appeared to receive preferential treatment while others faced harsher scrutiny without transparent justification. This imbalance affected morale and trust in leadership.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All