employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

B&H Photo Video

Is this your company?

this company is straight out of a dilbert cartoon - Anonymous employee B&H Photo Video Employee Review

1.0
Jul 22, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

all the company cares about is you punch in on time and you punch out on time, very little else. with that attitude you really dont need to be stressed out with performance at work. the coo has told middle management that given a choice of 2 employees 1 is a hotshot and gets everything done quickly and the other is someone who comes in on time and just barely gets by ,you pick the one who barely gets by

Cons

getting promotions has a lot to do with nepotism and what synagogue you pray in. the best thing that happened to employees was that bh photo was sued for millions of dollars because they were paying Hasidim more than the Spanish employees. after that lawsuit a lot of policies were put in place to bring policies into the 21 century.

Explore other reviews about B&H Photo Video

5.0
May 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

the company benefits are good

Cons

long hours and some clients can be demanding

2.0
Dec 11, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

• Talented, hard-working colleagues who genuinely care about delivering quality results. • The company has strong brand recognition and a long history in the photo/video industry. • Opportunities to take ownership of complex projects and develop cross-functional skills.

Cons

Across my time with the company, I experienced several leadership and communication challenges that affected team morale, clarity, and psychological safety: • Unclear expectations and inconsistent communication: Project success criteria and performance expectations were often not clearly defined, leading to misalignment, rework, and uncertainty about priorities. • Feedback lacked structure and consistency: Performance feedback was irregular and frequently non-constructive. When guidance was given, it tended to be broad criticism rather than actionable steps for improvement. • Difficulty obtaining clarification when needed: Team members often struggled to receive timely clarification on responsibilities or project direction, making it harder to understand the full scope of their roles. • Discouraged escalation and limited support: At times, employees felt discouraged from bringing concerns to HR or other support channels, creating an environment where individuals hesitated to seek fair resolution. • Meetings used in ways that increased stress: Meetings were sometimes scheduled under one expectation but then used to discuss unrelated issues or deliver prolonged criticism, contributing to anxiety and reduced trust. • Perceived inconsistency in how opportunities and scrutiny were applied: Certain employees appeared to receive preferential treatment while others faced harsher scrutiny without transparent justification. This imbalance affected morale and trust in leadership.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All