ETS Test Rater reviews

1.3

2% would recommend to a friend

(25 total reviews)
avatar

Amit Sevak

Not enough data to show CEO approval

10% positive business outlook

Test Rater employees have rated ETS with 1.3 out of 5 stars, based on 25 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Test Rater professionals have a poor working experience there. ETS is rated 65% below average by Test Rater professionals compared to other employers within the Educación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

25 reviews
4.0
Oct 31, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I appreciate the flexibility and working from home Working as an employee has definite advantages as opposed to independent contractor status Most scoring leaders have been extremely helpful in offering feedback Salary is good...could be higher

Cons

I have had an overall good experience with ETS and have only one issue...shifts. Seems as if I submit for a full month of work and receive 1-3 days confirmed work shifts. However, I am sure work is contingent upon the volume of test takers.

5.0
Oct 21, 2016

Online Rater

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible hours - you choose your schedule. Decent pay for a work from home position. There are lots of different tests you could be a rater for. Training and Certification are paid by the hour.

Cons

Sometimes passing the certification is difficult, but you have 2 attempts to pass. Communication by phone is difficult - cannot reach a person to speak to speak to.

1.0
May 22, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you prefer to work at home, do not need a reliable source of income, and are okay with assembly-line intellectual work, then this should be a good position for you

Cons

It is odd to see people say that they can set their own hours on this job. You need to submit your hours about a month in advance with the understanding that the more you make yourself available, the more likely you are to receive hours. ETS, on the other hand, can cancel an 8-hour shift the day before and is only obligated to pay you for 1/2 of the time. Too, there is no guarantee that you will receive anything like 40 hours per week during the peak season - even if you are regularly acknowledged as having high productivity with a high degree of accuracy. Further, if you don't pass calibration, which sometimes happens, then you only get paid for the time when you tried to calibrate. Thus, you will only receive one hour of pay instead of, say, the 8 hours you were expecting. Too, $13-15 per hour may look good for some, but you need to bear in mind that the position requires a high skill level and is part-time, temporary, and comes with zero benefits. The pay does not compensate for these disadvantages. The bottom line is that positions like these tie up hours that could be given to yet another employer who is offering contingent employment and then fail to adequately compensate you for making those hours available. If you're just looking for some mad money, then all of this should be okay with you. If you need a real job with meaningful, fair pay, it would be wise to look elsewhere.

Viewing 22 - 24 of 25 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,766 ETS reviews submitted anonymously by ETS employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if ETS is right for you.