ETS reviews

2.7

28% would recommend to a friend

(1,389 total reviews)
avatar

Amit Sevak

27% approve of CEO

20% positive business outlook

ETS has an employee rating of 2.7 out of 5 stars, based on 1,389 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The ETS employee rating is 28% below average for employers within the Educación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Jan 28, 2018

Online Rater

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Years back, (5+ years ago) being a Rater for ETS was a decent option for college and university instructors with graduate degrees to work remotely (and to "make up for" hours and wages part-time adjunct university teaching does not supply).

Cons

Many, but I'll keep it to three. (I'd give the company a HALF STAR rating, if it were possible.) 1. ETS used to offer the option of working up to 40 hours per week. It was a nice way to earn supplementary income. With part-time adjunct university and college teaching positions becoming the norm (as opposed to full-time tenure), most teachers find they need second jobs (or a spouse/partner that provides a second income). ETS stopped offering (near) full-time hours around 2012/2013. (Of course, they never offered health benefits, even for full-time remote workers.) 2. Scheduling is a nightmare, and insulting: You are told the more availability you offer, the more hours you will get. This means you are pressured/urged to submit availability for as many days and shifts as possible, but in the end, you randomly get half what you submitted for, or much less. You may submit for up to 40 hours per week (which you know you won’t get because they don’t hire any Online Raters full-time anymore), but you might end up with just 40 hours per month! Of course, they tell you that scheduling is based on test taker volumes, but since ETS is a MONOPOLY (owning the SAT, TOEFL, GRE, etc… basically every test every student hoping to enter college must take) their volumes are, except for in summer months, mostly steady. Basically, there is no way to figure out and secure a reliable/predicatable stream of income per month. 3. The most EGREGIOUS and morally reprehensible and insulting act ETS has committed: In January 2018, with no warning whatsoever, we were emailed a message (they called it a “Survey”) informing us that our HOURLY PAY was to be CUT from $18/19 + an hour to $15 per hour. No matter how many years we had been with the company and how perfect our work record was, we were asked to either Accept this change in pay and continue working, or to Reject it and walk away. Digging into the news, we discovered this interesting BIG FINANCIAL DEAL via Reuters: "Baring, one of Asia’s largest funds, would buy Prometric from a New Jersey-based nonprofit called Educational Testing Service (ETS)." Again, I would give ETS a HALF STAR rating if possible. The high level executives make a very healthy salary. Online raters mean NO OVERHEAD for ETS, and we work with our own computers/equipment. Could a company have a cheaper highly educated labor force? Shame on ETS!

2.0
Jan 10, 2018

Not for the long term

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This is a legit work-from-home job. You are scheduled according to your availability, which you submit on a monthly basis. I have never been penalized for canceling or changing a shift. It seems like an ideal job for part-time teachers and stay-at-home parents with a background in education.

Cons

There is almost no opportunity for advancement. Every couple of years, a program may accept applications for scoring leaders, but chances of getting those positions are low. As a rater, your day depends entirely on the quality of your scoring leader. Most SLs are fine and will treat you like a human being, and some might even make you feel like a colleague. Others have poor social skills, are needlessly condescending, and a couple have been outright hostile. There are limited channels to provide feedback on a scoring leader's performance. Some programs discourage SLs from sending positive feedback (it is seen as a waste of production time), so most interactions you will have with an SL are in the form of negative feedback. Scheduling is done in a way that best suits the program's turn-around time. It is expedient for ETS to have a very large rater pool that can score an administration in a couple of days rather than a smaller, more experienced group of regular raters who can work more carefully and accurately over the course of a week. As a result, hours are inconsistent, and shifts are frequently shortened or canceled once an administration is finished.

1.0
Oct 28, 2018

Used To Be Worth It - Rater

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work from home Flexible hours Long or short shifts

Cons

The recent $4 dollar an hour salary cut was insulting enough. Not so long ago, ETS put us on a timer and on a validity meter. Essay length nor topic complexity had been accounted for. The timer and "validity" meter are pretty insulting as ETS sees us now as pieces of its machine that need constant calibration. I'm a professional who has worked in International Education and ESL for over 10 years. I've been working with ETS for 5 years, and the only major problems I’ve seen with its tests are security issues. I truly enjoy having students show up at my door who are not the same students in the pictures shown on their tests. But, hey! Blame lowly raters for your woes, ETS!

Viewing 16 - 18 of 1,389 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,766 ETS reviews submitted anonymously by ETS employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if ETS is right for you.