Deloitte reviews

3.8

74% would recommend to a friend

(114,336 total reviews)
avatar

Joe Ucuzoglu

84% approve of CEO

65% positive business outlook

Deloitte has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 114,336 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Deloitte employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Administración y consultoría industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

114K reviews
3.0
Jun 28, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

(1) You will build relationships with a variety of smart, motivated people that you can carry with you long into the future. Networking is a large component of the culture. Deloitte is a very large place, but over time you can build a small circle of trusted colleagues that will make Deloitte feel much smaller and less impersonal. (2) Deloitte offers good compensation and benefits. This includes very generous paternity/maternity leave. Deloitte pays up to $500 per year as a health/fitness subsidy. Good educational benefits are available if you pursue another degree or a firm-approved certification. (3) Having Deloitte on your resume may open up many new opportunities for your career. If you can succeed in Deloitte’s culture, then it speaks well of your abilities to perform under pressure. (4) You will be offered an abundance of training. Deloitte University is an excellent facility. (5) Most anyone is accessible if you take the initiative to contact them for a meeting. (6) Working to support the mission of the federal government can be very rewarding if you find the right project. However, this benefit is not specific to Deloitte, only to federal consulting. (7) Great place to start a career for those coming out of college, but I’m less inclined to recommend Deloitte to those with significant experience unless you can make peace with the cons detailed below.

Cons

(1) Long Hours - At all levels, expect to put in at least 45-50 hours per week on average (sometimes much more) in order to meet expectations including client work, recruiting, training delivery, proposal writing, performance management duties, counseling to junior practitioners, etc. In my experience, this is not mentioned to candidates during the hiring process. (2) Summer - Work-life balance can be poor for many at the Manager level and above in the federal practice, especially during federal’s summer buying season. Frequent participation in proposal activities will be expected and often involves late nights, weekend work, conference calls at all hours, and disrupted vacations. (3) Work-Life Balance - Deloitte stopped using “work-life balance” and replaced it with “work-life fit.” Leadership talks a lot about flexibility, meaning that various PPDs still give you enough to fill 50 hours/week but if you choose to leave at 4pm to coach little league baseball, you are given the flexibility to work from 8pm-10pm to make up the extra hours you “owe” the firm. If you try to create balance, it will be very difficult to say no to extracurricular opportunities (especially to a PPD) and you may be branded with the dreaded “not a team player” label. (4) Vacation - Paid time off appears generous, however at all career levels you will either not be able to use it all or you will have to work extra hours to make up for the vacation time you use in order to meet your billable hour targets. After a few years, most senior people will begin to lose large chunks of unused vacation each calendar year as you can only carry over one year’s worth of vacation. (5) Client Projects – Ask for as much detail as possible about the project you would be working on before accepting an offer. Your job satisfaction comes in a far second to the firm’s bottom line if they are in need of people to staff upcoming contracts. I have seen Business Technology Analysts (BTA) who were hired to do technical work be relegated to writing weekly status reports all day for a PMO. Many highly-skilled people hired with the promise of performing advanced data analytics are withering away on long-term projects with no such work to be found. (6) High-Performance Culture – We are told that Deloitte has a “high-performance” culture. Translation: Everyone is competing in order to get the best year-end rating within a forced ranking structure. You can occasionally, at the more senior levels, expect to have others take credit for your work, be cut out of sales metrics you rightfully earned, or have materials that you have written "borrowed" by others without attribution. It is difficult to get PPDs to stomp this behavior out (sometimes they are the ones doing it to you) or to stick their necks out to get you the credit you deserve. In my experience, PPDs are reluctant to confront other PPDs if there is nothing in it for them personally, even if someone is clearly doing something underhanded to you. (7) Leadership Accountability - Real, accountable leaders within Deloitte’s matrix structure are rare. It feels like every PPD can boss you around, but no one is directly accountable for your care and feeding. For junior staff, no one above you is going to get in trouble if you sit on the bench. That is solely your fault, even if your leadership is not bringing in enough new business. For managers, if a PPD makes a string of poor decisions on which business opportunities to pursue, he or she will not be held accountable for your lower sales and revenue metrics if nothing pans out for all your hard work. Performance review committee meetings always focus on the individual under review and what that person did to help themselves. No one is held accountable for helping those below them be successful. Keep in mind that this lack of leadership accountability holds true for many other use cases. The risks are very much transferred to the individual at Deloitte much like an experiment in Social Darwinism. (8) Kiss Up Kick Down - Performance reviews come almost exclusively from your supervisors. The channel to collect feedback from peers/subordinates is very weak and contributes almost nothing to your year-end rating. If you have a bad project manager above you there is limited recourse available. Without hard evidence, your word will rarely be taken over someone at a higher career level. If your challenges are with a PPD, good luck getting someone to step in unless the behavior is truly egregious. (9) Like Having Two Jobs - At times, it will feel like internal Deloitte activities are a major distraction from your client work. If you care deeply about client work and want to focus on that exclusively, it may be an uphill battle for you on performance ratings, compensation, promotions, and ultimately it may affect your job security as you will be seen as “not contributing to the firm.” Deloitte now has a “Project Delivery” career track for people exclusively aligned to client work, but these people receive lower benefits compared to the other career tracks and may be subject to swift termination if a contract ends. Understand which career track you are being aligned to, and the differences, before accepting an offer.

1.0
Jun 11, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Brand name. Other than that nothing else. They offer sub-standard consulting solutions using unqualified and often junior resources billing at an insane rate offerring the client very less value addition.

Cons

1. Very cutthroat 2. No support structure 3. Bad staffing model 4. Poor compensation 5. Low work-life balance

1.0
May 2, 2019

*insert trash emoji*

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

BAL actually does a good job on certain aspects of being an employer. Well, really, just two. First, my coworkers were amazing and continue to this day to be my closest friends. When I was working for BAL, I found that whenever I was having a horrible day, my coworkers were quick to come to my cube to comfort me and share very kind and needed words. What makes these coworkers so sympathetic to each other? It’s because we were all on the same struggle bus and felt the bumps, both as little as an unhappy review to as big as a termination threat. We were familiar with each other’s struggles. Second, BAL actually has a good PTO program. Managers were easy to work with in terms of time off. Not a lot of red tape to get anything approved.

Cons

Ah, so this is where I go off. Y’all ready? Lack of inspiration — I honestly think the most prominent weakness of BAL stems from this. Business immigration itself is a lot of difficult, monotonous work. I wish BAL was able to combat that by being an inspirational employer to work for. Sadly, they’ve only made the practice even more uninspiring. How do they do this? See below: Pay — for the kind of work expected out of their employees, BAL severely underpays them. Not much to say here, obviously. Want to make more money in an inherently underpaid industry like business immigration? Then BAL is not for you. Unless, of course, you’re coming in as a partner or some other high-level employee whose pay makes zero sense given the little money PLs, AAs, and IAs receive. Punitive measures — BAL dishes out punitive measures to drive their employees into producing more work, even though they are already suffering from unethical caseloads. This is a terrible practice and only adds to the mental trauma faced by BAL’s employees daily. Such measures include stiffly-worded emails and phone calls with HR. I feel like the last thing overworked employees need is a threatening energy from their managers. Workload — I get it. More cases = more money. But the quality of cases produced at BAL is probably not ideal given how thinly spread their staff can be. It will not take a new employee to realize s/he has entered an immigration sweatshop. In addition to this, an employee will regularly encounter attorneys/managers who breathe down their necks and impose crippling micromanagement upon their staff. Management — It surprised me to learn that there were that many partners at BAL. It felt like there were too many cooks in this dysfunctional kitchen. In addition to that, leadership has also exhibitedsome unsavory behavior during my time. A prime example is the all hands meeting from early this year. The Managing Partner, the firm’s CEO, based out of Dallas became visibly upset on live broadcast (which is already distressing for us underlings to see) over the dismal survey results that revealed how unhappy BAL employees are with their employer. Instead of maturely and professionally addressing us, the Managing Partner erupted and suggested that if we’re really that unhappy, we should just leave. Not only that, he stated that he and leadership would even assist disgruntled employees with their exit. I found that incident to be extremely inappropriate and lacked the kind of leadership the firm needed. Very sad! Furthermore, the recent and abrupt personnel population decrease due to sudden lay offs across multiple offices should tell you a lot about leadership’s ability to plan, or lack thereof. People were onboarded onto the firm, only to be told their roles were to dissolve a couple of weeks after they had just completed training.

Viewing 109 - 111 of 114,336 Reviews

Glassdoor has 149,351 Deloitte reviews submitted anonymously by Deloitte employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Deloitte is right for you.