Crowe LLP reviews

3.6

62% would recommend to a friend

(2,610 total reviews)
avatar

Steven Strammello

71% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

Crowe LLP has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 2,610 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Crowe LLP employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finanzas industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
2.0
Apr 3, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Crowe as a whole may be a good company - Benefits are good - Remote work was around before Covid-19, and it's been a game changer - Great place to be micro-managed - Front row seats to watch your engineering skills **** off and die

Cons

- Applied Technology (AT) is filled with management that is toxic, incompetent, entirely incapable of utilizing any skilled people they acquire - Crowe is not a tech company. As an employee, know that somewhere up the chain of command is a slew of accounting and tax people ready to shoot down or vastly undercut your grand application of tech to this industry - Engineers at university, do NOT fall for their grandiose claims during recruiting. They recruit youth solely because they can drive them and pay them less. They give zero ***** about your career. There are plenty of other tech companies who will treat you the same, but at least you'll gain far more knowledge, better experience and better habits. The grind at Crowe's AT is not worth it at all. - Crowe attempts to value people, but their policies are undermined by the terrible people they have in management at AT. - Big layoffs multiple years in a row now. Their tech efforts are failing. They aren't hiring heavily because of growth but because of turnover and layoffs. They used Covid-19 as an opportunity to axe a lot of people.

1.0
Dec 17, 2015

Great learning experience

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

+++ There are truly a few good individuals in there - mainly at the Staff/Sr. Staff level. +++ Learned how not to treat your team/direct reports/clients

Cons

I can only speak for the software groups in Risk/Audit/Performance/Applied Technology/IT (RISK/AUDIT/PERF/AT/IT). +++ Yes-men get ahead. Do not dare disagree with them or offer alternative ideas as you will most likely be thrown under the bus. If management does like the idea, they will tell you no, then turn around and propose the idea to their management (thereby receiving praise/bonus from directors/partners). +++ Childish/petty us vs. them mentality with management. Will smile to your face but degrade you behind your back. Will do anything in order to make a sale and increase themselves. Will readily throw you under the bus to benefit them. Have actually been asked by people after meetings: "Did you feel the tire tracks on your back?". +++ High turnover rate because of unethical/immature middle management. Had to document communications with management as they would deny ever saying something if it caused them to look bad or wrong. HUGE Cover-Your-Butt environment. +++ Huge workaholic environment. 24/7 availability, regardless of vacation/weekends/nights/etc. May fit some people, who knows. +++ Lost count the number of times middle management (manager/sr manager) blamed software issues (especially when the software was developed AFTER the individual being blamed left) or degraded the character/attributes/religion/lifestyle of individuals who left the team. Fully expect to be "made fun of" by management even after your departure as that is how they treated *ALL* individuals who left. +++ Not necessarily a con for some people: It is a waterfall Microsoft shop. All Microsoft technologies, mainly from 2008 or older. No Java/Ruby/Rails/Linux/etc. to be found. Some development roles already being outsourced. +++ Technology/Software is a joke here. If clients audited the software development processes/documentation, it will be a short audit. There are none. +++ 0 career growth. Performance managers are a joke. Your career path will follow what they need. You will not deviate from it. In a meeting, management *deliberately* did not promote someone since they were doing an excellent job in their current role and they did not want to back fill it. I can go on but I don't want to waste any more time thinking about them.

1.0
Oct 3, 2023

Bad management

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

100% work from home. Managers do not micromanage. You really have to be independent. You'll learn alot in a short amount of time.

Cons

From the first day, no one was given proper training. Staff are expected to learn along the way but it can be overwhelming and a-lot to take in, especially because of tight deadlines. Managers do not care if you have other projects lined up. Every manager will tell you to prioritize on their stuff. If you're lucky enough to be paired with a good manager, then you're set. If you aren't, then you're in trouble. There's no "standard operating procedure" throughout the firm. Each manager does their thing differently. Some managers are easy to please but some are harder to please. They dont seem to distribute workload effectively throughout the business unit. Its either you get really busy or you barely have work to do. Overall, unless you have good guidance from managers who actually care, you are setup for failure.

Viewing 19 - 21 of 2,610 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,325 Crowe LLP reviews submitted anonymously by Crowe LLP employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Crowe LLP is right for you.