employer cover photo
employer logo

CH2M reviews

3.3

58% would recommend to a friend

(1,181 total reviews)
avatar

Jacqueline Hinman

56% approve of CEO

34% positive business outlook

CH2M has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 1,181 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The CH2M employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Servicios de construcción, reparación y mantenimiento industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Jan 10, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

CH2M had a great brand in the industry and some great people but the recent reorganization (which has been significant) is tearing everything apart. Still have a good technical team but that team is shrinking every week. Good work-from-home concept.

Cons

Environmental group now been run by Jacobs EPC leaders who know little about environmental. Over 1000 people recently left, but most of the long-term CH2M dead weight is still in place because severance would be too high. Environmental group leadership was bad but still profitable, but has gotten worse with the drastic reorganization. Reduced number of account managers significantly (in some markets >70% reduction), so clients are feeling the pain with less good client facing people and less technical doers. The $300 Million loan from Apollo is driving a major push to prepare to go public with Apollo/Bain seemingly making decisions on how to restructure. Only short term wins seem to matter, and cost reductions are constant, like the 1000+ staff reductions since November. Leadership is bad at all levels, from the CEO, to the Jacobs management hires who know little about CH2M core business and clients. What once was a highly ethical and well branded company is now gone - as you have everyone fending for themselves as layoffs have been fairly constant and a new structure that is hard to understand. I know hundreds of people who still work there and none seem happy and most would leave in a heartbeat if they get a good offer. Shipped many jobs oversees - from finance to procurement - and client projects get hit for excessive hours from people who don't seem to know what they are doing. I had a procurement person charge 8 hours to my client project to setup a new vendor and 6 hours from a finance person for creating an invoice. Also, drive for staff to be 100% billable has a lot of staff taking vacation if they can't find work, which doesn't seem right. People without staffing experience are in key staffing roles - which leads to some unethical behaviors. Sad to see a great company fall so quickly.

2.0
Jan 8, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay is good Benefits are competitive Great people who are incredibly competent Good projects for the most part Mostly focus on people, but that is rapidly changing

Cons

Current restructuring is creating turmoil and confusion Reorganization does not recognize difference between clients, projects, and corporate capability - one size does not fit all Executive team is out of their depth trying to keep the ship afloat without the experience to solve the fundamental problems facing the firm Reliance on consultants still wet behind the ears could be fatal to this once proud and world class firm

3.0
Jan 6, 2017

Ex-ch2mer

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Highly admired company during the time when I worked there. Always wanted to go back to work there. Used to be ethical, client focused and innovative.

Cons

I've been reading the negative reviews of late and can't believe how my beloved former company became like this. I remember the good times when Ralph Peterson was in office and I left in the early days of Lee Mac's tenure.

Viewing 346 - 348 of 1,181 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,285 CH2M reviews submitted anonymously by CH2M employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if CH2M is right for you.