employer cover photo
employer logo

CH2M reviews

3.3

58% would recommend to a friend

(1,181 total reviews)
avatar

Jacqueline Hinman

56% approve of CEO

34% positive business outlook

CH2M has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 1,181 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The CH2M employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Servicios de construcción, reparación y mantenimiento industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
5.0
Feb 16, 2017

Co-op at CH2M

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working for CH2M as a co-op was a great experience. I got to shadow full time professional engineers on various projects and directly communicated with clients. If you want a great learning environment and a friendly, personable coworker experience, CH2M Hill is the way to go!

Cons

Although there were many positives about this position and this company, the only downside would be the degree of work that was assigned to someone in my position. Understandably so, a co-op student who has not graduated from a university yet can only do a limited amount of work.

avatar
CH2M Response
9y
Thank you for choosing CH for your co-op and I'm happy to hear you enjoyed your experience. We pride ourselves on investing in student talent and will take to heart your comments around work assignments as our ultimate goal is to expose students to as much as we can in your time with us that complements your degree studies. Our Global Summer Internship Program is continually ranked as one of the best in the Engineering/Tech fields and we thank students like you who join us and also help us to get better by providing constructive feedback.
2.0
Feb 14, 2017

Falling apart

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people who want to do their best. Staff is absolutely committed to it's clients. Not only do staff want to do their best, but they are absolutely many of the best in the world in their respective disciplines. There is no doubt about this.

Cons

The CEO and senior management team have changed the heart and soul of the company. The new structure is really an EPC model that marginalizes the value of people and their relationships with clients and each other. Management says the opposite but that's just them trying to put a good spin on the restructure. Senior management is simply too far away from actually serving our clients and have followed the advice and direction from a relative newcomer to CH2M to lead BD activities and take her direction in restructuring the company to look like Jacobs. Unfortunately, Jacobs is principally an EPC firm not a consulting firm like CH. Senior leadership stresses how our restructuring is leading the market and the CH is the only firm using this new model. There's a good reason that no other consulting company follows this model. It's not new - it's just the wrong model for a consulting business. As a result of these changes, many top technical staff and managers have left and many, many more are weeks to a couple of months away from leaving. Leadership was "surprised" to see folks leaving in droves - literally. If our leadership really understood our clients and our business, this shouldn't have been a surprise to anyone.

1.0
Feb 13, 2017

Bad and getting worse

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

History and old philosophy but are things of the past

Cons

Bad managers, even worse senior leadership, could care less about how hard you work and no loyalty

Viewing 316 - 318 of 1,181 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,285 CH2M reviews submitted anonymously by CH2M employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if CH2M is right for you.