Transport for London interview questions

First is the online screening process one you submitted your application and is successful they provide you a link to the screening stage. Then if you are successful they invite you to a test center. It is like a school test, fairly easybif you are accustomed to that sort of testing

After applying via LinkedIn, I received an assessment invitation quite quickly. Instructions straight forward and interview took place in Stratford. Interview consisted of an 'unseen' presentation and a competency based interview. Again, all relatively simple process - only feedback on presentation is that, you are asked to complete a presentation about TfL. I would have preferred to present a comms plan on something that I had previously worked on. However, this was OK. Competency questions were also quite simple, and relevant to the role. I had some questions to ask the interviewers - as TfL are going through a significant change process, I asked how this was working within the business. This was a non inflammatory question but I felt the interviewer became quite defensive about the changes. This made me feel that maybe 'all was not great' within the team. I also felt that the structure of the role was not entirely clear - it is a hybrid of marketing and comms, however it appeared to be leaning more toward the comms side. This isn't quite clear in the JD and after the interview, I felt that maybe the team in situ were not totally clear either. I was due to hear the result within a week but this took over two weeks. No feedback was offered - as 'they are very busy with the number of interviews' For me, this is totally unacceptable - if you reach an interview, you should be offered feedback regardless of how busy you are. This was a clear sign to me, I would not want to be working within a team/organisation that take this approach. I think it is somewhat indicative of how people and organisations work. I don't think any one should be the victim of somebody else's inefficacy.