I was contacted by someone from the hiring team to gauge my interest, I had some knowledge about what they did and about their product going in. The process for me had multiple calls. The first was a straight forward recruiter call, simple stuff. Then I was scheduled for an interview with a person who was in the same position. The interview was mostly behavioral, questions ranged on various situations: how did you handle something, what would you do if this happened. I have an advanced Management degree and these questions were straight forward but i did feel atleast on two questions the interviewer wanted to hear something else. The interviewer had also just come out of a meeting so he was late a little harried. The problem with subjective questions is that the interviewer forgets its subjective. I may have made a mistake in stating my familiarity with their product and company, the interviewer then asked me to assume I have been working there for a while and answer how would I tackle some situations: what happens if we send the wrong communication, what happens if our product does not work. I answered them as an outsider would but he wanted to hear something else. There were other questions which require working knowledge of their product but he asked them anyway which was weird. I want to also point out one more thing without being rude, the interviewer had way less work experience and academic qualifications than I did and it did feel like there was a bit of that discomfort visible throughout the call. Most of the questions were garden variety: greatest strength, greatest weakness, describe a situation where you handled a client dissatisfaction. I think the recruiters were professional and accommodated my interview timing requests well but once it got to the interview and a post interview feedback there was none. I waited a month before reaching out and was told they were moving on, which is absolutely fine but reasons for moving on what did not match would be good. Also, i wonder if i would have ever got any feedback if I had not reached out to them. I had read reviews on glassdoor that they do not bother to reach out to you if you are not selected for the next step and it is true they do not reach out. Its a shame if they streamline their process well they can attract lot more talent. Also, the interviewer was very defensive about their product and the role. They have 2 different titles with same job description and when I quizzed him about it he could not explain the difference in roles (with one being the role he was working at currently).

Phone screen, then an hour interview with one engagement manager. I have to say the interview with the engagement manager was not good experience. The phone connection was very bad and she was obviously not patient, while I already checked my phone connection beforehand and there shouldn't be any problem from my side. Also, I thought that the interviewer was not trained to interview others. To begin the interview, she didn't introduce herself, or the interview process, or let me introduce myself. After saying how are you, she began by asking me a long question to give her a story that could answer that question, then the interview continued to be like this, all straight questions, and no any conversations. I highly doubted that she just wanted to finish the question list. Overall, the experience was not good.