I applied through other source. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Aidoc in Apr 2025
Interview
I saw their post on a facebook group and applied through the mail that was written there. I got a survey to fill about an hour later, then had a phone interview with the recruiter and then a zoom interview with a team member.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Phone interview took about 15 minutes. Questions I was asked: What do you know about the company? Are you afraid of repetitive work? What is your motivation to work in the field of clinical research? What are the advatages and the disadvantages that you see in this role? I was also asked to tell about a tool I learned independantly.
Zoom interview also took about 15 minutes. Questions: Describe your dream job, What kind of people do you like/don't like working with? Tell about a project ou have lead. Where would you like to work if not aidoc?
The recruiter called me to tell me that I didn't pass instead of just sending the generic rejection email, which was a better way to get rejected in my opinion.
I applied through an employee referral. I interviewed at Aidoc
Interview
There were multiple interviews with one simulation involving analyzing customer data to shape a conversation around how the AI algorithms were performing at that customer's health system. The other interviews were typical discussions with the hiring manager, team lead, other team members, etc.
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Aidoc (Tel Aviv) in Mar 2025
Interview
The first interview was an architecture interview, covering both the architecture I had implemented in my previous company and a discussion about Google's autocomplete, specifically its implementation using a Trie data structure.
The second interview was a 3-hour coding session at their offices. I was given an old codebase from Aidoc related to scan analysis, with a focus on Object-Oriented Design and SOLID principles.
The task was to refactor the Python code into any language of my choice while ensuring I understood the original Python code. The goal was to make the code more readable, well-structured, and generic.
Every 30 minutes, the interviewer would check in, provide feedback, and ask me to focus on a different aspect of the code. This process continued until the three hours were up. At the end, we reviewed everything together and conducted a sort of retro feedback session on the code, discussing how I would further improve it.
The interviewers were very nice, and although I didn’t pass the second interview, my overall experience with the company and their interview process was very positive.
Interview questions [2]
Question 1
The first interview was an architecture interview, covering both the architecture I had implemented in my previous company and a discussion about Google's autocomplete, specifically its implementation using a Trie data structure.
The second interview was a 3-hour coding session at their offices. I was given an old codebase from Aidoc related to scan analysis, with a focus on Object-Oriented Design and SOLID principles you need to refactor it