Merck Engineering Scientist Associate reviews

4.2

85% would recommend to a friend

(291 total reviews)
avatar

Rob Davis

91% approve of CEO

70% positive business outlook

Associate Scientist, Engineering employees have rated Merck with 4.2 out of 5 stars, based on 291 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Associate Scientist, Engineering professionals have an excellent working experience there. Merck is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Associate Scientist, Engineering professionals compared to other employers within the Farmacéutica y biotecnología industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

291 reviews
1.0
Mar 1, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work schedule Still a lot of highly talented scientists

Cons

Upper management no longer treats its employees with dignity; it treats them like a commodity. No investment in employees' skills--the first thing they cut when profits slide is the training budget. No opportunity for advancement unless you have the right connections. Workload is incredibly high and the scientific staff is stretched to the breaking point.

5.0
Mar 1, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Location across the bridge from Manhattan. The pay is very good however. The company was recently purchased by Merck. It maybe a risky time.

Cons

Very expensive housing, I found my 2-br apartment for $2000/month. The company was recently purchased by Merck. It maybe a risky time.

Viewing 283 - 285 of 291 Reviews

Glassdoor has 8,159 Merck reviews submitted anonymously by Merck employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Merck is right for you.