Merck Engineering Scientist Associate reviews

4.2

85% would recommend to a friend

(291 total reviews)
avatar

Rob Davis

91% approve of CEO

70% positive business outlook

Associate Scientist, Engineering employees have rated Merck with 4.2 out of 5 stars, based on 291 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Associate Scientist, Engineering professionals have an excellent working experience there. Merck is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Associate Scientist, Engineering professionals compared to other employers within the Farmacéutica y biotecnología industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

291 reviews
3.0
Apr 17, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has very good benefit packages, a very typical pharma corporate and include research and development.

Cons

A very professional corporate, where you are a number when lay off comes and frequent lay offs.

4.0
Feb 15, 2014

Scientist

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Salary, schedule flexibility, benefits, friendly co-workers

Cons

repeated company-wide reorgs, frequent layoffs

2.0
Jan 30, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The compensation is good (salary, benefits, health care) and the colleagues are smart, hard working and truly want to do the best for the drug industry.

Cons

Lack of direction. Many changes that have slowed the science down--and give a false impression of innovation. No one to take responsibility for decisions.

Viewing 262 - 264 of 291 Reviews

Glassdoor has 8,160 Merck reviews submitted anonymously by Merck employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Merck is right for you.