City Year reviews

3.3

50% would recommend to a friend

(2,284 total reviews)
avatar

Michael Brown

48% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

City Year has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 2,284 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The City Year employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Educación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
4.0
Apr 13, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You work on a team of 8-10 people, all from different backgrounds. Corps Members shape the program and bring new ideas which may be incorporated into the culture of City Year.

Cons

This organization is run by competent people that are 40 and under. Everyone is growing together, but this can be a pro and con. Sometimes, Corps Members do things that management doesn't like and management does things that Corps Members do not like. However, City Year allows all of its members to face their conflict and not run from it. This organization allows all members to voice their concerns and opinions. I would advise any 17-24 year old to join City Year, however, expect a lot of work (45-55 hours a week), with little pay.

2.0
Feb 25, 2010

The McDonald's of Community Service

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

City year has a great idea: give community members an opportunity to give back and support struggling schools, using the energy and idealism of youth for a tangible goal. There is also a lot of opportunity to design and implement your own projects-- however, this is both a pro and a con because it is made possible by a general acceptance of mediocrity and failure.

Cons

It's possible that City Year started out as the sort of participatory, energetic, competent organization that could really meet their goals-- a group of passionate young people who reject the apathy of their generation and work hard for others. But, even if it ever were such an organization, its mass production has now led to an incompetent shell of it's ideals of civic engagement. Employees (volunteers) are required to wear costumes daily-- t shirts or polos covered in branding from sponsoring organizations, and chunky Timberland boots (another sponsor), in red and yellow McDonald's franchise colors. Corps members should expect to spend a considerable amount of time selling the City Year brand-- from making sure any and all documents are covered in CY and sponsor logos to actual cold calls and fundraising. A considerable amount of time and energy goes into public military-like calisthenics that clearly have nothing to do with any aspect of helping children. The trainings for the first several weeks of service are devoted to imbuing in corps members the "culture" of City Year, which is passed on the form of "founding stories" and myriad inspirational quotes in the handbook. This "culture" talks with dewy-eyed admiration of democracy and participatory engagement-- yet doesn't leave room for volunteers to share and implement THEIR goals, and, worse, certainly doesn't make space for the people CY's supposed to be helping to ask for what THEY want. The few real and genuinely useful activities that corps members do, which in my opinion is limited to one-on-one tutoring in struggling schools, is painfully limited by insufficient training and devotion of time to more public (and thus potentially fundraising) efforts-- the big service days, calisthenics, filling out endless forms on childrens' "improvements" to show the sponsors, etc. I only spent about 4 hours out of my 40 hour weeks tutoring. Other CY activities in school were extremely poorly run, and often resulted in poor relations with teachers and the administration. As an 18 year old out of high school, I was left to manage an after school program for 30 children for four months when my supervisor quit, despite repeated requests for assistance from my superiors. This sort of situation was common. My biggest complaint with working for City Year is the disillusionment and lack of appreciation for individuality and honesty in the franchise. Civil service is not one-size-fits-all, and just because you say you're doing "good" doesn't mean you are. Or, in fact, that you're not doing actually harm by setting poor examples for they children who look to you as role models by being incompetent, brainwashed, and self-righteous.

5.0
Dec 19, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Corps members get to feel as though they are actually making a difference. It's not the job for everyone, its challenging. But City Year is upfront by telling applicants that the year will be difficult. There are TONS of opportunities for professional development. You really have the chance to impact children and get into your challenge zone. You'll never be bored. City Year isn't meant to be a job--this is why corps members are considered volunteers. If you apply to City Year, make sure you are joining because you want to change the world, not just because you need a job. If you apply just because you need a job, odds are you won't be satisfied. I've loved my year of service thus far--I feel as though I have truly impacted children and am making a difference!

Cons

Pay is low, hours are long, and the work is hard. But, as I said before, if you join for the right reasons, it is all worth it. City Year doesn't claim to be easy, and it isn't a job, you are a volunteer. It has been one of the most challenging years of my life but, by far, the most rewarding. I would recommend this job!

Viewing 2266 - 2268 of 2,284 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,493 City Year reviews submitted anonymously by City Year employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if City Year is right for you.